「中華英雄」周末之勝，說戰略得宜也好，說好運抽一檔也好，說只跑出五班也不如的時間也好，始終是交出今季第二場勝利。
季初一出即輕勝，曾令我和團體成員充滿憧憬，但去季屢拼未贏而且換過多位好手教馬也走勢欠順，已暗地裏告訴我們「中華英雄」是匹頗難駕馭的馬。
牠是有點「恰」騎師，過嫩的騎師催策牠不肯勇往直前，過硬的騎師牠左片右閃，戴眼罩牠會搶口，不戴眼罩牠跑來很「笠」(這是某冠軍級騎師的評語)，而最重要的是在沙圈時常會緊張冒汗。
但過往有一位騎師能給予牠信心，逐步騎卻用較柔韁繩去誘導牠向前，而牠過往獲一冠兩亞都是由這位老哥取得，此乃杜鵬志！可惜鵬志已返鄉，而用過同鄉高雅志落第後，廄主與我宛如孔明和周瑜一起對付曹操時不謀而合的「火攻」想法─用冼文諾！此君有點像萬成，身裁矮小兼手短，卻能做出杜鵬志般的逐步誘導。既然過往萬成及杜鵬志一樣將「富有心得」發揮得好，我們深信冼文諾也會交出杜鵬志的效果。在「中華英雄」奏效了，我會再將之試在「富有心得」身上！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
