騎師王周日開彩時幸好並無韋達參予，這樣可令馬迷見到表面好似個個都有點分頭，有點投注意欲。
但四月廿七日韋達回歸，我相信就能反映到彩池的真實情況。十倍以下騎師賽前退出就全面回水的頗不合理措施(太保障莊家利益)，在外國早已有應變方法，就是從最後派彩因應該位騎師的賠率而扣錢。每個外國合法外圍莊家都有扣錢表，就算一點五倍的熱門退出，也不會全面回水，而是中贏出騎師一瓣要被大幅扣錢。
而韋達復出，十場起碼有八隻或以上座騎，兼大部分有實力，如有在未受注時不負責任地說八場有六場座騎的韋達有定位三倍咁好分，我相信在接受投注時馬會這樣做會被懂馬之人(多的是)以大注迎頭痛擊，請記住谷草賽事今季十八次，如受注的話韋達做過十次騎師王！
但若韋達繼續壟斷座騎，而且大部分場次實力強頑，許多時候只開一點幾倍，又哪裡能令一向喜歡較高回報的馬迷去專注這個彩池呢？
這個彩池可以搞，我亦贊成搞，但不易搞，真的要看看投注部點搞？
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
