馬老不必大驚小怪

2008/07/18 17:00:06 網誌分類: 運動
18 Jul

    「人馬合一」,是奧運馬術項目甚至賽馬的至高境界。管你是世界最佳馬匹或最佳騎手,陣上不合拍,甚麼也徒然。


    有部分記者仍然對殘奧會香港馬術代表葉少康的本地好拍檔「履冰之注」抱懷疑態度,又說牠十八歲已等同人的七十歲(根本無根據),有時又無理據地懷疑葉少康究竟是否夠錢買馬。


    買馬及訓練的錢,一早已準備好,謝謝傳媒關心。買馬程序早由去年中開始,已超過一年了,而今年葉少康已抵英兩個多月,天天試馬及受訓──而由他試過的馬,一年來超過幾十匹。


    請記住葉君是下肢不能活動的選手,而且是東方身裁,一般歐洲或美洲盛裝舞步馬匹,就算幾叻都好,未必能完全適合他的坐姿,而最重要的是他下肢不能動,要靠兩條鞭控制馬兒,但大部分高水準盛裝舞步馬匹是不受鞭的。


    他是二級殘疾選手,比賽要求只是慢步及快步,買一匹叻的跑步馬匹亦無意義。我們幾經努力找到幾十匹馬讓他反覆去試,領隊、外國教練及探子都功不可沒,更何況不少外國馬就算只是七或八歲,勞損程度都已甚嚴重,不能通過買馬的測試!在殘奧港隊只限一匹馬的情況下,葉少康當然不想花巨額買來的馬,到頭來在賽前已「喎」咗。


    葉少康想夥拍哪一匹馬出賽,傳媒無必要自己加主觀意見,他夾哪一匹馬,與哪一匹馬「人馬結緣」,他自己才知道。總之大把錢等住佢買馬和訓練用。就算佢真的決定用「履冰之注」,傳媒也不應潑冷水或責怪任何一方──當十歲老馬「強中霸」今年在跑馬地也能跑贏多匹四、五歲馬,而馬術亦有六十七歲的老將參加奧運,年齡對於馬、對於人,其實不是你們想像般的誇張。

回應 (1)
我要發表
2008/07/20 21:24:33 回覆

美國証監會一方面禁止沽空 19 隻金融類股份 30 天, 另一方面又豁免註冊造市商、大宗頭寸商以及其他真正在從事造市及對沖交易過程中賣空上述19家股票的造市商。

其實散户根本無能力進行沽空交易, 而美國市場最大參與者乃是機構投資者, 散户所佔比例有限。

上述豁免, 對解决美國金融業信心危機, 是否有幫助?

http://www.hkheadline.com/blog/reply_blog_edit.asp?f=SCJYHEB5PV54662&id=123903

user

最新回應

Bruce K. Paxton
Bruce K. Paxton 2017/07/16

You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)

One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.

Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.

To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise       one   will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure   one    is known for sure   and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the

 marriage relationship  which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor.    From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton