赤壁有軀殼無靈魂

2008/07/21 16:38:01 網誌分類: 賽馬
21 Jul

《赤壁》宣傳聲勢浩大,演員粒粒皆星,畫面亦靚,可惜徒有軀殼,卻欠靈魂。

有咁好咁多資源,票價收七十五,觀眾自然有期望:但怎會有瞪目的張飛,在掩護劉備與子民撤退時,卻欠了家傳戶曉的「喝斷長板橋」一事?趙子龍百萬軍中藏阿斗,冒死將兒子交給劉備,劉備做戲咁做想將兒子擲在地上令將士折服的一幕,又無!孔明在東吳殿上舌戰群儒,用激將法令孫權出兵,為何周瑜這個重要的角色不在殿上?而孔明以大小二喬的比喻更是精粹所在,《赤壁》連提都不提!

兩小時多的半集戲,殺戳場面佔了一半以上,有否必要──三國的故事之所以引人入勝,是文戲兼且鬥智,武打如關羽過五關斬六將,都只是綠葉式的配襯。

有一點替買了票有熱切期望的觀眾不值:娛樂傳媒太厚待吳宇森及眾明星了,為何連《赤壁》分上、下半,首映禮後的報導不提?當然保障票房十分重要,娛樂傳媒亦可能樂於賣這個人情,但從事實的角度,完場時連黃蓋用苦肉計及草船借箭都未有,這個「下回分解」的關子的確賣得大。如非專欄作家蔣芸在首映五天後的文章出街,相信許多市民仍不知道有「赤壁之戰」下集,遲些才公映呢!

回應 (2)
我要發表
2008/07/23 21:35:36 回覆

吳嵩先生,

你好哦!

你是否沒有聽從醫生吩咐按時服藥啊?!

吳殿上舌戰群儒,用激將法令孫權出兵,

為何周瑜這個重要的角色不在殿上?~~哈哈....哈.真係想唔叫你做傻佬都唔得!

院友周瑜當時跟你一起在院中扮血統專家吖嘛!!咁快就唔記得咗喇!!

吳嵩先生,記得準時食藥呀!!^_^

 

 

2008/07/21 17:16:04 回覆

孔明在東吳殿上舌戰群儒,用激將法令孫權出兵,為何周瑜這個重要的角色不在殿上?

 

Mr Ng, pls read the novel again and see whether Zhou Yu is at that scene or not.

U can make the guess on horse's breed.... but u can't change the content of the Novel. 

Personally , I think u know nth about movies. Red Cliff is not intended to tell the "exact" story of  三國演議 or 赤壁之戰 alone.

Pls , at least hav adequate knowledge before you  make your comments.

user

最新回應

Bruce K. Paxton
Bruce K. Paxton 2017/07/16

You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)

One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.

Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.

To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise       one   will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure   one    is known for sure   and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the

 marriage relationship  which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor.    From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton