亞視唔係無得搞(一)

2008/12/23 17:17:06 網誌分類: 未分類
23 Dec

    王維基風波雖然惹來泛民傳媒同情,但歸根究底以如此招積的風格空降入樸實的亞視,根本是格格不入。十二天內覆亡,是查氏家族英明果斷的做法。

 

    我在大學碩士課程時是修讀機構行為及市場學,而其中一主修科是「機構文化」Corporate Culture,每個老機構都有其固定文化,一如老樹盤根,就算有倚天劍狂斬力劈,都不可能動搖根基,如連根拔起,機構即失去其靈魂支柱,會瞬即敗亡。

 

    如果亞視當年不背靠祖國,而夾硬與無線撼香港廣告,可能一早已支持不住。背靠祖國打開了新天地,華南一帶電視觀眾比香港多出何止幾倍,而華南一帶企業亦靠亞視將產品向香港及國內(透過亞視使產品更矜貴)推廣,不少國企民企能令香港人瑯瑯上口,亞視功不可沒。

 

    如今一個膚淺的香港Sales要去除中國化,老友﹗你有甚麼本領去這樣做?香港有這麼強的消費力咩?仲有叫梁家榮等傳統傳媒人去「報業化」新聞,根本是侮辱了專業新聞報道。所以難怪市面對魔童大部分是喝倒采!

 

    不過亞視是有得搞,有得救的,明日告訴你。

回應 (4)
我要發表
2009/01/01 17:16:40 回覆

絕對同意吳生對 '黃維基'睇法 .... {#imgnews_5822_l.jpg}

2008/12/23 19:34:40 回覆

{#15112.gif}

 

Merry Christmas & Happy New Year !

2008/12/23 17:35:45 回覆

吳生高見,快快同我地分享!哈哈! {#icon0}

 

立 冬
立 冬 2008/12/23 17:28:16 回覆

期待你的高見! ^ ^

user

最新回應

Bruce K. Paxton
Bruce K. Paxton 2017/07/16

You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)

One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.

Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.

To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise       one   will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure   one    is known for sure   and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the

 marriage relationship  which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor.    From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton