活化歷史建築項目

2009/02/19 17:43:06 網誌分類: 賽馬

19 Feb

    周二正式公布活化歷史建築項目結果，雖然與早前的小道消息吻合，但部分卻是香港市民未必想見到的決定。

    固然我相信小組是以最「科學化、最客觀以及最嚴謹」的審判手法作出決定，令在文件、資料和數據上並無日後要爭議的地方，但將北九龍裁判法院判給美國藝院基金去搞數碼媒體有關的課程，而否決八和會館申請。老友，乜數碼媒體課程畢業生宜家出路好好咩？乜香港電視或電影業仲咁缺人咩？你們相信這個計,畫提供的一千五百個全日制學額，就算全數有人請，畢業生出路又如何呢！

    某傳媒名宿曾經告訴我，自己從不參予此類競投計劃，不是他無本領去做一個好的科學化Presentation，而是審批計劃的小組因多屬業餘人士，過分側重美化了的Presentation。這位名宿曾經試過向某小組提出專業計劃書，結果某小組選了一個年輕的公司，該公司Presentation花了很多錢做電腦技巧，但到贏得標書要執行計劃時，居然託人找某名宿出山去執行，令某名宿頂到上心口。政府口口聲聲說要幫助粵劇發展，老友，我相信八和的Presentation未必好過美國學院，但肯定的是幫到粵劇界！

回應 (0)

我要發表

Bruce K. Paxton 2017/07/16

You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)

One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.

Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.

To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the

marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton

活化歷史建築項目

網誌分類

最新網誌

最新回應

月曆