勿因醜聞離棄馬圈

2009/02/23 17:00:41 網誌分類: 賽馬
23 Feb

    馬圈最近似乎運氣平平,跑馬地又發現可疑人物在千二起步點搞搞震,截稿時有報道說可能是○七年「飛針案」的延續篇,而某已婚外籍冠軍練馬師捲入「子女贍養費」訴訟,亦有高銷量文字傳媒接連報道,連同早前某華籍練馬師捲入的車廂風化案,難怪有朋友笑謔如果由娛樂圈名導演開拍新戲,不愁冇題材。

    這個圈子裡光怪陸離事件甚多,但能出街的只是冰山一角。知情者固然不少為保障自己而沉默,但也有不少是「愛護」這個圈子,無謂令是非多多的馬圈再被醜化。

    早前也有報章報道,某馬主擬向代為購馬的某練馬師及其代理索償,我自己不知道箇中詳情,不予置評,加上已進入法律程序,亦不方便提出影響任何一方的意見。而馬會就此事特別在去周三出新聞稿,並勒令該駒退役,記憶中是第一次。
 
    希望這些風波在短期內平息。馬圈在金融海嘯中是跌幅最少的行業,但香港市民已如黃台之瓜,何堪再摘,一旦因為醜聞而離棄馬圈,就不堪設想了。

回應 (0)
我要發表
user

最新回應

Bruce K. Paxton
Bruce K. Paxton 2017/07/16

You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)

One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.

Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.

To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise       one   will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure   one    is known for sure   and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the

 marriage relationship  which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor.    From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton