一波未平，一波又起
正當奧巴馬大聲疾呼AIG高層應退還花紅，甚至不惜用行政手段向收花紅者徵重稅，講都講到嗆親之際，最先搞衰美國經濟，亂咁借錢俾人的房利美同房貸美又「玩嘢」。佢地居然宣布會向過百員工發花紅，話要「留住員工」云云，而且「是必須的」。這些員工包括年薪超過五百萬港元的營運總監威廉斯，他將會獲發超過四百七十萬港元的花紅！
房利美剛剛向政府要求一百五十億美元援助，原來係想將公帑放入自己袋。「留住員工」？簡直係天下第一大笑話的借口，房利美及房貸美的員工，犯了這麼大的貸款判斷錯誤，出面機構搵邊個請佢地？仲有呀，佢地宜家保住份工，全賴政府注資拯救，如今繼續享高薪厚祿之餘，居然仲咁斗膽用最荒謬的理由拿花紅，呢種事真係外國地方先會發生，因為華人仲會有「廉恥」二字。
奧巴馬在法津上有無辦法阻止，大家可拭目以待。但我建議任何商界人士入行前都先要上Ethics課程，而且要考試──營商也要有道德！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
