杜拜賽績不能作準

2009/06/25 16:30:28 網誌分類: 賽馬
25 Jun

一場杜拜免稅店錦標令「神勇鬥士」成為世界最高分的馬,但當日牠在無可能的情況下段段快開,愈走愈有取勝,放死馬后「伏特加」及上屆盟主「精闢圖像」而大勝「百威勝」,單從數據,牠在一哩是無敵的。

但當日是詩柏告別日,第一至第六場全由阿拉伯擁有馬匹取勝,賽果令人疑惑,而且杜拜並無賭博,賽果最重要是主辦者和群眾開心,大家明白了。

「神勇鬥士」在安妮女王錦標成大熱門,許多紙上賽績信徒大注重鎚,但雅士谷逐步上斜的直路跑法根本不同杜拜平坦的詩柏,而且欠缺經驗的阿拉伯騎師前段以為自己在杜拜,力騎狂放,到最後二百米已完全潰不成軍,大敗十多二十個馬位而回。

賽前模罕默酋長罕有地接受訪問,鬥志不容懷疑,但結果在杜拜牠的蹄下敗將「柏高小子」由夏偉卓按韁取勝,此駒一直以來被人認為只宜千四,一哩不到,結果在乾快場地有快步速後上取勝。

今季杜拜世界盃賽日的賽果,有部分是完全不能作準的,大家不妨拭目以待。

回應 (0)
我要發表
user

最新回應

Bruce K. Paxton
Bruce K. Paxton 2017/07/16

You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)

One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.

Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.

To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise       one   will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure   one    is known for sure   and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the

 marriage relationship  which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor.    From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton