八月一日起澳洲實行二百米前只限打五鞭，最後二百米只限連打三鞭，不守規者會受重罰。
當地賽馬局用八屆悉尼冠軍騎師昆頓在網頁及DVD解釋好處，他更認為騎師應先手足並用推騎，到二百米處才開鞭，效果更佳。
但這例如在香港實施行得通嗎？
以香港馬迷容易受傳媒煽動，以及對贏輸金錢看得重要，試想想騎師打少一鞭而結果馬兒落敗的感受會如何？
又從實際角度，騎師在走位和判斷步速已要不停用腦，如今又要數打了幾鞭。老實說，英國實施直路只打六鞭，戴圖理一樣試過犯規。昆頓固然在DVD內用了一個騎 師無節奏亂打鞭的例子，但相信不少馬迷寧接受打多幾鞭而落敗，條氣順一些。此例其實是禁二百米像狄克文式車輪鞭連打三鞭，如像歐洲式推兩步打一鞭，是不犯規的。
值得一提的是當年馬彼得的反手划艇鞭是不受此例限制，大家可以明白當年「馬先生」贏馬時馬兒的超卓情況。年屆七十的他有冇興趣復出呢？
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
