早兩天在墨爾本Marcus Oldham College演講，講題是「馬運之都──香港」，內容主要是香港賽馬及馬術發展史，由十九世紀講到現代。
整個演講用Power Point形式，圖文並茂之餘，亦播放一張奧運馬術DVD作終結。籌備了這個演講差不多一個月，還覺得可以做得更好，但公職及私務繁忙，四十五分鐘演講加十五分鐘答問時間，搜集資料也頗為費時呢？
雖然香港並無大學或專上學院提供賽馬管理課程，但馬會的賽馬發展部在訓練見習學員或馬房員工時，不少材料也與海外提供賽馬管理課程的學院銜接。
天下賽馬原是一家，廿一世紀的馬圈是充分國際化，你學我的好處，我吸收你的精華，無一家獨大，睥睨一切──我在演講之餘，也與彼邦教授及講師作出交流甚至學嘢──馬海無涯，唯勤是岸。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
