點睇悉尼大橋上食早餐的活動？
我並唔係講笑，封閉貫通南北悉尼市的跨海大橋，讓市民能在周日早上與家人坐在鋪上人造草坪的橋上享受家庭樂，農業合作社更帶來牲口如牛羊，讓孩子們接近和更瞭解農業世界。這個由新南威爾斯省旅遊局及澳洲電視台合作的計畫，完滿成功，更在世界各地電視播放。
你想想香港這個號稱自由民主的都市，有沒有一天可以達到這樣開明？
就算區議會肯搞，又有人資助，政府部門又大力支持，依然會有傳媒訪問到一些「不在我後園」式的抱怨聲音。更何況要前三者為類似項目合作起來，過程又是何等艱鉅呢？
我在回港的航班上想，與其等待類似節目在香港發生，倒不如回悉尼享受這個過程吧！
不是不喜歡香港，而是對無限上綱上線的戰鬥感到厭倦。
放棄鑽空子，人也開心點。放棄斤斤計較，人也快樂點。一人行一步，容易協調，容易磋商，更容易得成正果。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
