民主黨做到嘢

2010/07/01 17:27:04 網誌分類: 未分類
01 Jul

先表明立場,多年來各位讀者都知,我一向逍遙自在,無黨無派。

但假若我是民主黨員,我會為主席何俊仁的表現引以為傲。

上周我的分析文章,大家看懂箇中奧妙吧。這幾個月來中央、中間人及民主黨的秘密互相角力,而爭取到一人兩票的第一步成果,這才是國際間最常見的政治藝術,高瞻遠矚,我反而會覺得民主黨促成這一步,會令游離選民甚至建制派的選民覺得他們真正做到嘢!下屆區議會和立法會,他們不會流失席位,反而有增加的機會。

流失最多選民的相信是公民黨,政改一役令不少人瞭解到甚麼是迂腐和執迷不悟,死抱所謂道德高地和原則。此類「港女」和精英主義性格,長綫會否趕走普羅求穩定求繁榮及兩餐安樂茶飯的市民,有待觀察,但講去得盡,又唔夠社民連,講政治技巧,又遠遜民主黨。兩頭唔到岸,中央亦暫時不會青睞他們的意見,形勢嚴峻。

對於社民連,從來也沒有寄予任何希望,每個地方都有類似的政黨,也一定會獲得極端政見人仕的支持。在世界上的議會如缺了類似分子,會少了許多娛樂性。

回應 (0)
我要發表
user

最新回應

Bruce K. Paxton
Bruce K. Paxton 2017/07/16

You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)

One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.

Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.

To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise       one   will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure   one    is known for sure   and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the

 marriage relationship  which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor.    From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton