香港不少八十後日日埋怨政府，日日說制度對他們不公平，得閒就去示威抗議，呻到樹葉都落。
但請看看國內八十後黎嘉敏，三點四億買凱旋門天價豪宅。雖謂其夫是國內中等有錢人，但也是經營醫藥及建築，勤懇努力而致富。而她父親起初也是務農，後憑經營化肥生意賺了錢，自建了兩幢物業自住。
國內致富機會高，抑或香港發達路數多，我無研究。但肯定的是埋頭苦幹，咬緊牙關努力向上的一批的致富機會，遠比事事嗟怨，處處口說不公平，自己也不做好本份的為高。
路是自己行出來，坐在路旁喊打喊殺，說甚麼人不讓他們起步，路又太泥濘，未起好又不應叫他們去行等等的言論，邏輯竟與近日甚麼事也是政府不對的不謀而合。
年青人不妨停一停諗一諗，羅馬不是一天可建成，廿多卅歲就想買靚車住靚屋，是非分的妄想(除非你自己是富貴人家)。我自己第一間物業，當時是借九成，首期是自己捱更抵夜節衣縮食慳回來的。廿幾年前萬幾兩萬澳元，不是小數目，我力捱去儲，供樓時有多餘錢就還多少少，不足八年便供完。(待續)
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
