坐飛機如家常便飯

2012/10/25 18:34:37 網誌分類: 賽馬
25 Oct

 

今晚上機去墨爾本「食飯」兼睇打疊的覺士盾賽日(應該是一日一夜)。

 

在本欄告訴過各位,今年覺士盾嘉年華是一日一夜,周五晚是短途一級賽萬利加多錦標,而周六則是覺士盾。彼邦馬會總裁一早已邀請我南下觀戰兼晚膳,剛好自己也有安排馬匹周六及周日在澳洲上陣,這個行程是必去的。

 

其實恰巧另一位好朋友布里斯班市長康爾克帶領商業代表訪港廿四小時,周末抵埗,上周他相約敍舊時,我只能說我去了他的國家。不過不要緊,有緣千里能相會。他們代表團在周日晚離港返澳,我已約好他下周在昆士蘭見面,由墨爾本出發只須兩小時內陸機而已。

 

廿一世紀生活其實應該宏觀地放眼世界,甚麼也要捍衞、甚麼也要緬懷,人也容易變得暴戾和不講理。去世界各地交朋結友,無論是自助行抑或早已有老友在五湖四海,多看看、多聽聽、多交流,你會發覺自己會愈輕鬆,愈不計較得失。今次旅程可能令我錯過幾個香港拉頭馬和贏錢的機會,但又有何所謂呢?海闊天空,是我掛咪後才領略到的享受。

 

回應 (0)
我要發表
user

最新回應

Bruce K. Paxton
Bruce K. Paxton 2017/07/16

You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)

One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.

Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.

To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise       one   will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure   one    is known for sure   and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the

 marriage relationship  which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor.    From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton