看過一篇有關香港人投訴文化的文章，其實投訴是自古以來各個民族都有的現象。對現實各個現象不滿，市民都有投訴的權利。 不過若事事都嘈，小小細節不滿便無限上綱上綫，甚至乜嘢都要人頭落地而後快，這就是個危險的現象。 為何香港大小事情都好似停滯不前？其實或多或少都受投訴文化影響。 只要小事令某一兩位居民或政黨不滿，被大嘈特嘈，施政者都寧忍讓。好的政策收回或改到體無完膚，日日有之。 不妨告訴各位一件事，一個專業知識公認冠於業界，表現備受機構同儕讚賞的專業人士，因小故得罪某勢力人士。某勢力人士因利益受損，便煽動黨羽在網上攻擊並向某機構投訴。剛好機構換部門主管，某勢力人士與主管稔熟，這些投訴便正好成為開刀的器具。 該專業人士離開後，原本他負責的項目由未夠資歷的人接任，自然今非昔比。其實投訴聲可以很大，不過負責的主管只要有專業知識和水平，根本就可置諸不理。不過這通常不會在香港發生。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
