茶餐廳搞上市，在國際上並非第一次。星巴克及麥當勞在美國，以至全球掀起飲食文化，上市賺個盤滿砵滿，專業搞上市，當然是順理成章，但究竟基金經理Buy不Buy這個概念，還是希望普羅大眾一人買幾手，像大家樂般支持本地飲食業，就見仁見智。
專業的路程很獨特，它並非走大家樂麥當勞般的街坊文化，也不是主打年輕路線，反而從價錢來說是高檔茶餐廳。舖位是最靚的旺市大街，餐飲及食品都比一般快餐店和茶餐廳為貴。但從商業角度，只要有錢賺，貴和平是無意義的。
反而較有興趣的地方是根據資料，質素食材成本佔收入的比重較人工及租金為高，這真的有點始料不及。而包銷售等對它的估值甚高，也令不少人側目。麥當勞及星巴克可以完成跨國跨區任務，大家樂大快活則未竟全功。「翠華」能否以香港茶餐廳文化去攻陷大陸以至世界各地，我真有興趣放長雙眼看看，希望它能成功。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
