明珠台早前有個關於賽馬的節目，主持人訪問了練馬師姚本輝及其擔任策騎員的兒子，馬主蕭百君及施雅治，見習騎師學校校長陳念慈，以及一位見習學員等，算是個從多角度看香港賽馬的節目。
當然對完全不懂賽馬為何物的觀眾，這節目是個很好兼勵志的入門介紹。但賽馬，又豈有這麼簡單呢？
還記得幾年前國家地理頻道曾透過製作公司來港拍攝了一個名為Hong Kong Big Bets的節目，播放了好幾次，分別從社會學(訪問學者史文鴻)、普羅博彩大眾(訪問中過兩次三T，一生大上大落的關其抗)、馬會，以及媒體製作角度去看香港賽馬。拍出來更貼近實況，令人更覺有血有肉。
不過明殊台節目中訪問蕭百君，最精警的一句是賽馬要講運。若要事事有絕對，請離開馬圈，若要在港投資有回報，請離開馬圈(在外國有育馬業則截然不同)，香港賽馬僅為消閒性質，固然有職業集團開山劈石，但只是極少數的人。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
