活侯夫人、大衛希斯、賀嘉時、莫德等都是世界級冠軍人馬，他們成功之道，除了練馬功力深厚，最重要是對馬主有禮，專業之餘，也知道什麼叫賓主。
某地方某有頭有面馬主向我訴苦：「我的練馬師以前在別處練馬時，冠軍都未贏過，現在水鬼升城隍，態度十分精采。我有匹合夥馬養在他的馬房，見半年也未出賽，致電問問究竟，他居然回答，我知你是誰，也知道你是合夥人之一，但請叫首席合夥人問我，然後就掛綫。」
當然你在某地稱王，你老細或主顧忍得你的話，自然可以要風得風。但這樣的態度，實在過分。
還有一個更精采的事發生在某現役澳洲練馬師的工作人員身上，他替馬主買了一匹馬，屢拼不逞。馬主和顏悅色地問馬兒是否未熟，他居然說：「人養馬你養馬，乜你咁黑架，係咪撞邪呀？」馬兒自然轉倉，表現如何已是後話，但此君的命運，卻如江河日下了。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
