在社交網站上我貼了一幅無自己的相，卻是我上周六澳洲打吡日的寫照。
那是幅有許多個馬牌的貼圖，有馬主沙圈證，有會員入場證，有當日新南威爾斯賽馬局的午宴VIP証，有董事包廂証。對不起，當天實在太忙了，自己的不同角色，很快在歡呼聲中溜過了。
雖然兩駒出打吡也名落孫山，但有羅達及莫雷拉分別穿着自己綵衣，以及兩位冠軍級練馬師希斯(香港、墨爾本及阿德雷特)和石爾純(馬來西亞及紐西蘭)，這幅合照格外珍貴。
「高山遠景」拼了幾仗，已露疲態，一週內跑兩場大爛地長途賽亦頗吃力，我們決意休息，再考慮會否運港。
「浪濤洶湧」反而體力充沛，今仗若非未適應右轉，直路內閃難以催策，可能更為接近。我們將牠運返墨爾本，小休兩三天，健康正常的話，三周後誓師阿德雷特南澳打吡！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
