在英國睇了大部分初賽的第一輪及第二輪賽事，阿根廷入四強之路相信甚為平坦，甚至最有冠軍相。
眾多球隊中，大家都看到德國和荷蘭都光芒四射，但這正是世界盃大忌，初賽放盡來踢，他們一個月內還有踢七場好波的氣力嗎？以前有八十年代巴西、丹麥以及上屆的阿根廷前車可鑑，我都不敢高估荷蘭或德國。
阿根廷今季學懂了「收」︰要贏就點到即止，一如巴西鄧加做隊長時一樣。初賽不悅目，減少浪費氣力，到八強及四強才顯露真本色，一如八二年意大利及上屆西班牙。
阿根廷的綫位實在靚絕，倘若保持Ｆ組首名，下仗對手充其量是瑞士或厄瓜多爾，可輕鬆過關，八強遇到最強對手不外乎是比利時、葡萄牙或美國其中一隊。四強對手則估計是意大利或荷蘭其中一隊，但荷蘭初賽用得盡，意大利在南美世界盃亦未威過。我估計阿根廷可一直殺入決賽，能否捧盃就看運氣了。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
