父母親結婚週年慶，自然要身在悉尼。
曾在他們金婚之年，我選擇回到他們當年結婚擺酒的六國飯店，而且盡量邀請當年曾出席他們婚宴的人仕。
今年是五十八週年，他們的意思是不大搞，家人聚首便好。
這週末是推卻一切約會，安排他們的慶祝活動。我不是指鋪張的慶祝，而是搞個有意思的聚會。
各位也應該知道八月份南半球是冬天，所以盡量避免戶外活動令老人家著涼。
真要向我父母親請教如何相處五十八年之道。我相信不單只有包容二字，而是彼此相信，彼此愛護，最重要的是默契。一個眼神，一個手勢，就懂得對手所指所需。
老一輩的人生於戰亂，婚前相識相處時間其實不多，不少卻在同甘共苦之下度過一生。反觀生於安逸的一輩，就算婚前拍拖如何久，甚至早已同居，離離合合反而是閒事。根基打得不好，往往是經不起考驗的。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
