有傳媒新聞網站上周執笠，主事人是泛民死士，自然透過泛民媒體大數悲情和白色恐怖，而泛民佔據的大氣電波也自然唱和。
但大家都知道香港是個自由營商的社會，管你是天王老子，佔據如何高的道德高地、有甚麼理想大志，只要是營運模式錯誤，必定慘敗。
我無黨、無派、無政治立場，做了多媒體超過二十年，經驗告訴我廣告是不用乞的。只要你內容吸引、夠讀者數量，以及消費模式符合廣告客戶要求，廣告客戶就會就會Buy你。反之你的內容是日鬧夜鬧，日批評政府夜批評支持政府的人，管你文筆如何秀麗，落廣告的客戶是生意人而已，如何切合他們的需要呢？
很奇怪，看過傳媒歷史，發覺由民國到二戰後，再到廿一世紀的香港，除某傳媒集團因為有報紙、周刊、八卦雜誌，員工、前員工或作者又在大氣電波佔據位置互拼，加上老細在經濟上支持某派議員，所以得以生存之外，個別獨立媒體不論報紙或網站，即使有過剎那光輝，但若凡事必反，罵得愈凶，生存空間就愈小。試想想，你想推廣產品，剛好在旁的文章是罵人的，消費者怎會開心認同呢？
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
