近年個別報道有針對國泰的事件，也引述部分乘客的意見，去形容由榜首跌到第三位的國泰的慳錢及不滿。
但對我這個超級飛行常客來說，搭不同航機如同吃飯，這些國泰乘客的形容，換在其他航空公司上，根本就是小兒科。你說國泰跌，其實其他航空公司仲跌得交關，總之整體航空業，受到成本上漲(尤其工資和燃料)的影響，票價也不加反減，試問在哪些地方可以慳錢呢？
也許傳媒朋友日以繼夜工作，少搭飛機，不知道近年華東空管的情況，去慣上海的朋友都知道，絕大部分班機都有延誤的情況，三四個鐘是等閒，就是華東空管，與任何航空公司無關，要問要投訴，請向彼邦民航局或軍方。
而乘客安全近年是航空公司第一大議題，故發現任何機器微小問題，機長都寧願取保守方法，檢查為上。你去揸車發覺行得不順，你也會去車房檢查一下啦。延誤是不幸，卻是有必要。
至於飛機餐，算罷啦！廉航部份連飛機食物也是自己俾錢買。而飛機餐多年各個航空公司都無法改善，因為無明火爐去炒餸！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
