周末出席了馬會與馬主協會合辦的首次馬主研討會，與不少新馬主朋友交流過心得之餘，也代表馬主協會致歡迎辭。
很高興見到新的馬主朋友不少都是年青才俊，也全情投入賽馬，也積極參與購馬過程。這是正確當馬主的態度。
更開心的是不少都攜眷參與活動——賽馬從來也是一家大細的玩意，世界各地也是，否則怎能薪火相傳？如今早幾年馬會放寬馬主攜同未成年子女入場的政策，並獲民政事務局首肯，實屬德政。大家看到孩子們在凱旋門的歡顏，就明白這一點的重要。
我更開心的是不少年青才俊志同道合，組成團體去參賽，他們都知道世界各地馬價高昂，養馬成本上漲。自己縱有財力，一人承擔風險實在不低，故合夥或組成團體，自資買好馬，運港挑戰大賽才是上算。馬會來季大幅度加獎金；增幅以高班賽事為最多，買隻普通馬在四五班博博下，贏兩場隨時未夠一年養馬費，更遑論是回本呢？
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
