是否這幾年來香港部分人士的價值觀，變得無理兼是非不分？
的士是要俾高昂的牌費才能經營，眾所周知這是盤要註冊的生意。做生意就算有極少數害群之馬(行行都有)態度不好及打茅波，都始終是法例規定下的受保障的經營。
如今一個Uber程式，令白牌車直接與的士競爭，就算他們賣的是好服務及安全駕駛，以及「刺激當地經濟活動運作」。這種走法律罅式的無本經營，卻被部分人高度讚揚。
這令我想起十多年前外國某博彩交易平台的成立，又說提供最好賠率，又說可令博彩人士有不同角色的自由。結果一如所料，衍生出騎師或部分參與者的舞弊情況。
當然香港是自由社會，踩界的事情，講得俗點是吹佢唔脹。但的士業界的震怒，今次是可以理解的。如果政府不在政策和執法上做點事情，是違背真理及傳統價值觀念。記住政府一直是收的士牌費，容許免費打茅波式生意與的士競爭，說得去嗎？
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
