今天剛收到澳洲賽馬局的電郵，立即與各位分享。
澳洲馬匹瘟疫爆發已被控制，正步向全面剷除。
自去年十二月廿二日開始，已無新感染個案，而澳洲賽馬局主席皮雅臣於今天正式宣佈，所有今年週歲馬拍賣會可以如期舉行，而過省的運輸條款，將於未來四星期內逐步解除。
澳洲政府正與日本、星加坡、香港、紐西蘭、伊朗、南非及阿聯酋商討重開出口市場，但英、美、荷、比、愛及韓等國家均可繼續以瘟疫爆發前的檢疫條例入口澳洲馬。
而從澳洲墨爾本運輸公司給我的電郵，也證實澳洲馬匹入口最快可於二班實行，但會先接收從未有疫症爆發的維多利亞省馬匹(墨爾本)，以策安全。至於新南威爾斯省(悉尼及獵人谷)，則要該省馬匹先行在省內檢疫一段時間，然後運往墨爾本再檢疫一次，但目前仍未正式實行──換句話說，香港馬主養在新南威爾斯或昆士蘭兩省的馬匹，都未必可在二月至三月份在香港見到愛駒。
而馬會究竟可否如期在打比日前舉行國際馬匹拍賣會第二部份，則有待兩地政府的最後磋商及協調！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
NO LA...THX FOR YR INVITATION
I AM NOT THAT RICH......
READ ARTICLES FROM GALLANT CHIEF IS ENOUGH
obama,
咁嘅英文就有網上feel,我喜歡.
國際馬匹拍賣會第二部份,你會唔會去呀?
uturn
跟傻瓜爭辯是浪費生命
i agree....
but it is valuable ....
when people start to know...
傻瓜's definition...
priceless
obama.
這世界不單吳生幸運,我亦一樣.
祗因有你的回應.
有人說：跟傻瓜爭辯是浪費生命！難得你……..
我實在喜歡這感覺^o^
uturn
吳嵩...u are lucky....
eventually find a perfect match here......haha
you 2 behaved like twins
hahaha...............
one day,
a young gun ask his boss....
"what is 1 plus 1 equals to...."
the boss said...." 3....."
the young gun replied
"u can find others to replace me,goodbye"
but ofcoz still have many people in the world will reply.....
"yes u are right boss.....u are smart....it is 3".....
.for whatever reasons.....
.
another good book for all the readers here
"introduction to logic" by copi and cohen....
.
.
obama.
我冇遇過1+1=?,都要長篇大論的問題,
今次你的英文冇上次的精簡,亦不是現在的網上價值觀.
有時間上下[高登網頁]可能你會開心啲.
uturn
故事一則
有一間上市公司請會計,
第一個應徵者被問:1+1=幾多? 第一個應徵者說:2
老闆說:你等通知啦.
第2個應徵者被問:1+1=幾多? 第2個應徵者說:3
老闆又說:你等通知啦.
第3個應徵者被問:1+1=幾多? 第3個應徵者說:老闆你話幾多咪幾多囉.
老闆立即說:你幾時可以返工?
昨晚行經廟街,見一[地灘]賣舊書,我問亞叔有冇此人[amy gutmann]的書賣,佢話你找錯地方啦!
i am now teaching a kid maths....
very simple one....1+1=2.....
that naughty boy...insist that...1+1=3....
i asked him why....
he answered"i like it...i like 1+1+3..."
...speechless.....ofcoz...u can like 1+1=3....whatever u like....
u do have the rights to believe in whatever u like....
example....my mum is male...my dad is female......whatever u like....
it is funny to have people behave like this
like a crown.....
but it can be very dangerous....
eg...."i like to believe that U238 is no harm to human beings"..."i like to believe that I wont get HIV if I inject 100ml of hiv infected blood into my body"......"i like to believe that i can survive without oxygen"
but a more dangerous situation is that....we prejudice a person just becoz we hate them....
example..."a person u hate tell u ....1+1=2."....u against this....just becoz u hate him...or ...a person u hate, tell u "you mum got heart attack ,she need to get into hospital asap......"....but u rejected him...just becoz u hate him.....
thats what we call ....irrationality