屈穎妍
屈穎妍
屈穎妍

腦,原來是這樣洗的

2018/12/04 04:12:45 網誌分類: 生活
04 Dec
          近年有個常見熱門詞,叫「洗腦」,打開腦袋強灌水進去,以洗成你想變的模樣。單是字面上帶出的暴力感,就很震撼。

          其實,開天靈蓋只是一種概念,真實洗腦到底是怎樣的?這裏,就有一個活例。

          今年是國家改革開放四十年,十二月將在北京舉行一項盛大慶典,屆時會有一百名對改革開放有傑出貢獻者的人獲表彰授勳,當中一個是中國首富、阿里巴巴集團主席馬雲。日前《人民日報》公佈授勳名單,附上各人簡介,馬雲名字後面的「共產黨員」四個字就成了國際焦點。

          法新社用「中國首富馬雲被揭是中共黨員」來做標題;《紐約時報》就說:「馬雲背後的主導力量,屬於一個擁有八千九百萬人的權力精英俱樂部:中國共產黨。」

          BBC則如此解讀:「對商人來說,入黨是一種權宜之計,但明確中國最成功的商人馬雲是黨員,卻可以增強中共的合法性。」

          「被爆」、「揭露」、「驚人大發現」……這些,都是洗腦的關鍵詞,潛意識讓大家覺得,共產黨員身份一敗露就大件事,從而覺得這「共產黨」不是甚麼好東西。

          奇怪,我們從不會說:「特朗普被揭是共和黨員」,為甚麼馬雲是共產黨員的身份卻要報道得這麼負面?共產黨是中國第一大黨,是黨員有甚麼稀奇?這就是西方式的軟性洗腦,在字裏行間,讓你對一些正常事生了喜惡感。其實,馬雲在大學時已入黨,不是外媒亂猜的甚麼為了討好當權者而入黨。據馬雲的大學同學憶述,他是杭州第一屆學聯主席,也是化學系學生會主席。那年代入黨不易,要學習好、人正直、有組織能力、有熱情、有理想和服務精神,才可入黨,馬雲就是大二、大三左右被選中,可謂百裏挑一。

          其實在內地大學,優秀學生被吸納為共產黨員,是常識,老外大驚小怪,以負面標籤式洗腦,才是其心可誅。

        屈穎妍
■馬雲日前公開的退休名片上,無中共黨員的頭銜。
 ■馬雲日前公開的退休名片上,無中共黨員的頭銜。 
  
回應 (0)
我要發表
user

網誌分類

最新回應

bumper
bumper 2018/12/14

大國政權一向都恃勢凌人,我國國內的異見份子,維權律師 也遭軟禁或被消失... 相比孟小姐,他們沒什麼大錢, 就算有也不能做什麼.. 究竟有冇政協代表或建制派去跟進下?

孟小姐有錢有大國勢力,加國可以做到幾多呢?只有嚇下佢,然後好多中國權貴以後不再敢移民去美加。而那些維權人仕便只好繼續被判監或消失,不能見家人,直至當局對他們的"悔改"感到滿意

愚公
愚公 2018/12/13

Prof. Kam C. Wong,

Writing in English will not given any credit to yr book。  Crime is Crime. No excuse at all.

Dr. Kam C. Wong
Dr. Kam C. Wong 2018/12/13

Greetings.  

 

I have the pleasure to inform you that my book on Public Order Policing in Hong Kong: The Mongkok Riot (Palgrave, Dec. 2018) is now in print. (Foreword: Professor Gary T. Marx)http://www.mit.edu/~gtmarx/mkr_foreword.pdf;  Book:Public Order Policing in Hong Kong - The Mongkok Riot | Kam C. Wong | Palgrave Macmillan)

 

The book serves as the first and only “Independent Inquiry” into the cause, conduct, reaction and impact of Mongkok Riot.  The study promises to inform the public and bring closure to a regrettable law and order incident in Hong Kong.

 Some findings: HK needs an "Independent Inquiry" (II) for a number of reasons, e.g., informing the public and facilitating research.  In the end, each HK person should come to terms with MKR, after considering all the facts and circumstances, background and context to the case.   

While I favor an II, there are also substantial limitations to II, in scientific and political terms, such that it is not likely to find the "truth"  (scientifically) as to what happened and/or able to settle the "scores" (politically) with respect to who is to blame.  (Chapter 7). 

 The book is written for the Hong Kong people.  Should you be interested in discussing any issues raised in the book, please let me know.  

 

Please share with your colleagues.

Best regards and Happy NY.

 

Prof. Kam C. Wong, J.D. (Indiana), Ph.D. (Albany)

Xavier  University (Emeritus)
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Fellow, Center for Criminology, HKU

 

 

炎澄魂
炎澄魂 2018/11/29

還有啤酒的.也不是很貴的飲品.