屈穎妍
屈穎妍
屈穎妍

警察策動的綁架案

2018/12/13 05:12:46 網誌分類: 生活
13 Dec
          加拿大駐華大使館官方微博在三天前的國際人權日發了一張圖片,上書幾隻大字:「人人生而自由,在尊嚴和權利上,一律平等。」

          我想留一句言:中國人除外。

          孟晚舟事件讓大家明白,甚麼自由、人權、法治、民主,原來只是西方遊戲,說得偉大,甚麼地球村、聯合國、尊嚴、權利……他們可沒說過「受」你中國人玩。

          隨便拘捕一個人,捉了才開始想罪名,還要鎖着手鐐腳鐐上法庭,這種是甚麼人權?

          我常說,好多事,只要易地而處,就可以看出荒謬處。試想想,如果喬布斯女兒在入境中國時被拘捕、關柙、手腳鎖上鐵鏈、再以千萬美元保釋、保釋了都要掛着追蹤器兼有司機及保安貼身監視,你猜,將會引發甚麼樣的國際政治風暴?啊,對不起,一定不止是風暴,該是地震海嘯龍捲風加火山爆發的威力,再外加導彈瞄準的威脅。

          然而,因為這個是中國企業創辦人的女兒,她的命,忽然變得不值錢;她的人權,忽然變得不重要。無罪名的拘捕十多天,咆哮的,只得中國人;強硬譴責的,只得中國外交部,那些聯合國呢?那些國際人權組織呢?

          明白的,當綁架案主謀原來是世界警察,別人又怎插手?怎報警?怎幫忙?關起人家的國民,要求千萬「贖金」,然後加拿大大使館在官方微博臉不紅耳不熱發帖說:「每年的12月10日是人權日……讓我們共同維護平等、正義和人的尊嚴」,本年度最大笑話,莫過於此。

        屈穎妍

        
回應 (3)
我要發表
bumper
bumper 2018/12/14 02:23:04 回覆

大國政權一向都恃勢凌人,我國國內的異見份子,維權律師 也遭軟禁或被消失... 相比孟小姐,他們沒什麼大錢, 就算有也不能做什麼.. 究竟有冇政協代表或建制派去跟進下?

孟小姐有錢有大國勢力,加國可以做到幾多呢?只有嚇下佢,然後好多中國權貴以後不再敢移民去美加。而那些維權人仕便只好繼續被判監或消失,不能見家人,直至當局對他們的"悔改"感到滿意

愚公
愚公 2018/12/13 22:13:48 回覆

Prof. Kam C. Wong,

Writing in English will not given any credit to yr book。  Crime is Crime. No excuse at all.

Dr. Kam C. Wong
Dr. Kam C. Wong 2018/12/13 11:34:15 回覆

Greetings.  

 

I have the pleasure to inform you that my book on Public Order Policing in Hong Kong: The Mongkok Riot (Palgrave, Dec. 2018) is now in print. (Foreword: Professor Gary T. Marx)http://www.mit.edu/~gtmarx/mkr_foreword.pdf;  Book:Public Order Policing in Hong Kong - The Mongkok Riot | Kam C. Wong | Palgrave Macmillan)

 

The book serves as the first and only “Independent Inquiry” into the cause, conduct, reaction and impact of Mongkok Riot.  The study promises to inform the public and bring closure to a regrettable law and order incident in Hong Kong.

 Some findings: HK needs an "Independent Inquiry" (II) for a number of reasons, e.g., informing the public and facilitating research.  In the end, each HK person should come to terms with MKR, after considering all the facts and circumstances, background and context to the case.   

While I favor an II, there are also substantial limitations to II, in scientific and political terms, such that it is not likely to find the "truth"  (scientifically) as to what happened and/or able to settle the "scores" (politically) with respect to who is to blame.  (Chapter 7). 

 The book is written for the Hong Kong people.  Should you be interested in discussing any issues raised in the book, please let me know.  

 

Please share with your colleagues.

Best regards and Happy NY.

 

Prof. Kam C. Wong, J.D. (Indiana), Ph.D. (Albany)

Xavier  University (Emeritus)
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Fellow, Center for Criminology, HKU

 

 

user

網誌分類

最新回應

師奶
師奶 2019/10/17

警察只係佢地工作,佢地都有亞媽生嘅

愚公
愚公 2019/10/17

部份越是高学历的人:医生,律師,教師,工程師等等,當开始信仰一樣理念,那種堅持,固執会比一般普通市民恆久,相信同佢地对讀書考試那份耐力有关,他們会想:我地相信嘅野点会錯的呢??以我的聰明才智是死也不会錯的!!

暮跖
暮跖 2019/10/17

雷射槍八婆醫生暴徒

有正常醫生唔做,做暴徒黑醫護(醫生/護士)

投訴
投訴 2019/10/17

向醫管局投訴: {#icons_boy4} {#icons_girl4}

enquiry@ha.org.hk