泛民要反省

2008/06/04 16:58:02 網誌分類: 賽馬

04 Jun

距離立法會選舉只得三個月，各政黨已密鑼緊鼓地部署各區策略。但如何宣傳，如果大聲疾呼，如何口口聲聲說自由民主或為港人謀福利，待人接物的態度就是致勝的最重要元素之一，但似乎泛民部份議員仍未掌握到要竅。

不知道是否專業資格就令部分人覺得自己高人一等，滿口仁義道德，卻視人如無物。近日出席了不少官方活動，當然各黨各派的議員都有參加，自己從無政黨背景，左中右派都有好友，自由黨多為生意人，長袖善舞，議員自然友善，就算不熟，也握手打招呼有話題，而且更會主動與我講馬問貼士。民建聯或部分無黨派人士就算不認識我，亦笑臉點頭，互相交換名片，我相信這絕對不是爭取選票的敷衍笑容，反而是人與人交往的開始。

但個別泛民的立法會議員則令我失望：在會場內不是不識別人，但不單不與人握手自我介紹，連與舊雨談話也極少。平時可能見他們滔滔雄辯，但原來對人是這麼冷漠，根本好像不放人在眼內，而最要命的是他與一位體育界名人談話，我與另一位朋友與該名人打招呼，名人想介紹這位議員給我們認識，這位泛民議員居然走開，令名人啼笑皆非。

口口聲聲話制度對他們不公平，又說政府親疏有別：如今連基本禮貌也沒有，仍抱自己小圈子精英心態，如何能令選民信服呢？

回應 (2)

我要發表

2008/06/05 12:29:18 回覆

BEING ISOLATED AND COOL LOOK ARE THEIR TRADE MARK

2008/06/05 10:24:19 回覆

香港好多事情, 都是讓人感到奇怪。

Bruce K. Paxton 2017/07/16

You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)

One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.

Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.

To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the

marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton

泛民要反省

網誌分類

最新網誌

最新回應

月曆