係事實先好講

2008/07/30 17:31:20 網誌分類: 運動
30 Jul

居然有電台主持睜大眼講奧運馬術無人睇,佢拍檔仲話梗係啦,無得賭吖嘛!

如果呢個係笑話節目,容許亂講嘢,仲情有可原,但若是晨早時事節目,就算腔調想輕鬆一點,都應該講事實,亂講就是主持不專業或不尊重節目和聽眾的表現。

信口開河已成為近年某些人的趨勢,根本不去查證事實──就算在周一未加推馬術門票之前,我在周日上過中旅社獨家發售馬術門票的網站,十三場中已爆了十一場,而剩下兩場的早場盛裝舞步初賽,都只餘五百以下的位置,換句話說,全部馬術門票(超過二十萬張),除了周二才最後推出的一萬四千張,其餘十八萬幾張之中,只剩少於一千張未賣,咁仲話馬術項目無人睇?

大家看到周三才賣加推票,周一在旺角已大排長龍,而周二上午決賽票已全售罊,我秘書網上訂初賽票,揀幾場都滿晒──香港人支持奧運的熱情真的沒法擋。

無得賭便無人睇?乜嘢邏輯?我相信那位主持連馬場都好少入,乜有得賭就一定受歡迎咩?跑馬地夜馬夠場場有得賭啦,又唔見次次有超過萬八人(馬術場館入場人數上限)入場?

回應 (0)
我要發表
user

最新回應

Bruce K. Paxton
Bruce K. Paxton 2017/07/16

You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)

One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.

Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.

To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise       one   will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure   one    is known for sure   and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the

 marriage relationship  which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor.    From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton