平時港人說買股票基金是投資，賽馬是投機。
如今一個金融海嘯，股市匯市基金都被淹沒，而賭馬係輸極有限，因為你不會全副身家押下去，但股票或基金，不少人視它們為長綫投資，雷曼事件，就將這個觀念完全扭轉，原來遠在他方一個評級AA的超級大機構，可以一日玩完，跟住累埋香港千千萬萬可能被誤導迷債就是一個保本基金的市民。
我們俾的賽馬貼士，有時準，有時不準，財經演員的股評和分析，準與不準，你們自己心中有數，不過他們有非專業的拍檔，在節目裏襯托出他們的專業性而已。
投資節目有銀行贊助，電台環節有窩輪支持，但賽馬節目，不少產品視為賭博避免扯上關係，傳媒名宿左丁山寫得好，報紙財經專欄許多時較歡迎唱好的作家，大家在金融海嘯前或海嘯後，仍見到大部分叫買入的建議。
在外國讀書時代將投資和投機分得很清楚，但不知怎的，回港後見到兩個概念都十分模糊。不是眾人皆醉我獨醒，而是眼見如此，無從施救。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
財經大師Benjamin Granham (股神巴非特Warren Buffet 的老師)幾十年前已經清楚解釋什麼是投資及什麼是投機。可是, 不是每個香港人都清楚明白。
大家可以到以下網址看Benjamin Granham "Intelligent Investor" 一書。
http://www.hkheadline.com/blog/list_blog_express.asp?f=A2Y2ZKSLJH70219
Maven馬到成功