美國變天

2008/11/11 17:33:05 網誌分類: 政治
11 Nov

奧巴馬贏唔出奇,奇就奇在大勝咁遠。

他的領導才能如何,無人知,但布殊政府衰到貼地的統治:中東戰爭泥足深陷及金融海嘯,令美國民心思變。他們根本不會容許共和黨再統治下去,所以就算民主黨派希拉莉,又或共和黨麥凱恩更叻更好,贏嘅都係民主黨候選人。

奧巴馬真的要把這個千載一時的機會,為自己及美國青史留名,首先國民知道布殊留下一個爛攤子給他,要他收拾殘局,路途艱辛兼漫長,所以會對他更包容──如加稅或收緊銀根,國民不會過於抱怨,而他們不會要他一步登天,反而希望他像摩西帶領過紅海般──一個前所未有的谷底。

他獲得超過五成國民支持,民主黨也壟斷了兩院,是近三十年來民主黨首次的大強勢,正是大刀闊斧改革的好機會。大換閣員和幕僚不在話下,我亦建議他趁機整頓財金官員。格林斯潘退休後,因為他實在太叻及影響力太深遠,伯南克根本不夠班亦不夠膽去「做嘢」。美國大把人材,重建經濟是首要任務──若奧巴馬能把握時機在就任初期建奇功(如列根上任立即解決伊朗人質事件,之後事事順遂),美國人就更擁護他,更支持他的改革。

奧巴馬,睇你啦!

回應 (0)
我要發表
user

最新回應

Bruce K. Paxton
Bruce K. Paxton 2017/07/16

You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)

One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.

Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.

To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise       one   will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure   one    is known for sure   and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the

 marriage relationship  which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor.    From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton