如球壇或後輩給予林尚義一個崇高的評價，那麼何鑑江也絕對值得同樣的表揚。
何林在港台的黃金歲月，簡直扣人心弦，令球迷如痴如醉。還記得亞洲盃外圍賽香港對北韓一役加時再和到互射十二碼，我當時一直有聽收音機，二人都差不多無氣，但繼續賈其餘勇以最專業的評述，替港隊打氣，而林尚義在射第二輪十二碼時話鍾楚維射得入認佢做老豆，更成為經典，可惜繼後胡國雄射歪，施建熙射得太正，港隊在射十四輪十二碼後飲恨，但如果港台能重播該場賽事錄音，各位球迷就真正能貨比貨，比較一下甚麼才是真正專業評述兼且極視聽之娛了。
後來林尚義轉往商台，何鑑江就夥拍乃弟何靜江，林尚義則帶新人，現在商台的新聞總監蔡文堅(堅哥)以及何文光是也！分道揚鑣，卻各自各精采。
何老鑑及後往國內發展，除講波之外再搞青訓。激情一抒，但肩負教育責任。還記得當年香港對大馬一役，郭家明射失十二碼，何老鑑大嗌「香港隊完蛋」，現在的球評人敢嗎？
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
這就是江湖地位了！阿叔是我們永遠的阿叔，長留心中！