英國愛爾蘭在夏季幾乎天天跑夜馬，澳洲悉尼試過在肯達百利於周四跑夜馬，而墨爾本的夜馬則在周五，場地是滿利谷。外國無夜馬的日子，也有跑狗及跑馬車，而澳洲更是每省都跑。
香港適不適合在一周內多跑一次夜馬，行政上並無問題，取決純粹是政治角度。如果在外國參戰馬足夠的話，一周跑足七天也無問題。香港要加賽因而要增加馬匹入口，這並不困難，問題是一些為反對而反對的聲音，往往蓋過專業和理性的分析。
有人曾問周四跑夜馬有何好處？我會反問周四跑馬有何不可？不過從平衡和讓市民作息有序的角度來看，若他日改為周四跑夜馬，接着的賽日定必要是周日，而不能在周六作賽，而如果維持在周三跑夜馬，則可靈活地用周六或周日。當然若加賽期到一周跑三次，則應是周三晚、周五晚及周日，不過來季最多只可能加五天，單是今季的空隙已填滿，以上分析未必用得着。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
同意，外國天天跑馬，小弟個人記錄--早上十一點跑本地七場，中午美國十一場，晚上再來十場車仔馬，嘩--系香港人 (果班人) 大驚小怪 ，多跑五天都話要研究幾個月，將來全年跑馬，他們應要游行反對。我又不覺多跑五天有何分別。更不覺跑週四晚有何分別，返覺馬會開始勇於試新的安排，有進步，哈哈我都好少讚馬會的.........