慳電膽一役，特首被兩大傳媒集團加一份自詡公信力好的報章狂轟。前兩者是頭版頭條，力度十足，衝着特首而來。
睇慣兩大集團攻擊政府的作風，對此覺得並不稀奇。但今回我有點替曾特首不值。
除非是完全不吃人間煙火，身邊無家人、無親戚、無朋友的人做特首，否則推行任何政策，都不可能避免這些瓜田李下的關係，但這樣的人不可能當到特首，因為無人脈何來選票和支持呢？
曾特首今次推行慳電膽現金券，連親家也不通知，已是做到最保密不過；可惜的是他身邊的公關顧問和智囊似乎政治觸覺慢，忘記提醒有這樣的風險。原本有兩個拆彈方法，第一是不放在施政報告，改由環境局局長邱騰華公布而免去一切避嫌；第二是一早申報利益，更表明連親家也不知。
其實慳電膽世界各地即已大力推行：前年澳洲政府更免費為各家各戶換慳電膽，德政要主動出擊，而且公關仗要打得好！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
