當一位陪酒女郎響應某極端泛民黨派號召去參加所謂變相公投，立即被某自稱民主傳媒封為新一代「民主女神」；當中四生反高鐵時走在最前衝擊警方、政府喊「起錨」他就瞓街阻政務司座駕，雖然話職業無分貴賤，未成年也有人身自由及抗議自由，但大家撫心自問，這是正確的價值觀嗎？
「o靚模」「新民主女神」「未成年激主進示威者」，若非有某些傳媒大肆報道，根本未必會引起社會關注。但如今他們成為了傳媒不斷提及的新聞，也間接令到社會各界震驚，年青一代會否被這些鋪天蓋地的「資訊」影響？又會否不斷有年青一代模仿甚至超越他們的行為？
書展叫停「o靚模」簽名會的書籍，雖然不民主，價值觀卻正確，起碼告訴市民書展是正派書籍銷售和文化交流的地方，而不是被出位「o靚模」騎劫的場地。我也喜見社民連如何激都好，都開始提醒這群後生黨員顧及安全及告訴他們行動的理念和甚麼時候收手。至於陪酒女郎日後會否成為學者或投身甚麼高尚職業，不是本欄討論範圍。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
