選舉日入馬場，打呔也十分慎重，既不能打橙色，也不能打藍色，亦費事打紅或黃惹人說會我是泛民中人。
馬簿內有「齊心」上陣，竟然是出自「賀」廄由姓「梁」騎師上陣，十分巧合；但綵衣卻是黑色，兼帶白帽，以顯示些甚麼呢？
梁營在中聯辦全力箍票下，居然七百票也拿不到，今仗慘勝，既要還票債，也要面對低民望的管治困難。但以他毅力十足，做事也不留情而大刀闊斧，雖千萬人吾往矣，硬推硬闖將會是常見的。這可能是好事，也可能是壞事。
唐營敗在自亂步伐，當然有人掌握黑材料(未必是梁營)，在適當時候逐張牌打，兼且有友善傳媒盡情發放，唐營是無法抵擋的。但我相信唐營是敗得心有不甘，唐英年會否豁出去，成為另一個陳方安生般的鬥士？重返立法會又如何？
當然最失敗和醜陋的是最後關頭轉軚，以及在聽真正民意一意孤行的選委。廿二萬港人在民間投票電腦被駭客入侵之下親臨票站自己投，五十幾巴仙叫流選白票呀！不過我也很高興見到有建制選委有良心，大家數數最後白票數目就知了。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
