今天在昆士蘭訪問姬飛大學，早前紐約市長彭博提出「大學無用」的見解，個人覺得只是以偏蓋全的謬誤。
若你只是斤斤計較地以月薪計算，水電工、通渠匠甚至厭惡性行業的從業員，搵「錢」的確比一般大學生為高。
而讀大學也的確學費高昂，也可能浪費了不少讀不上的朋友的光陰。
但你又可曉得，讀大學是個過程，是個階段，也是人生真正開竅之時。
讀中學時有點讀死書，背誦狂刨，不求甚解。大學教授們的講學，看似天馬行空，實際上是啟發你們思考，而導修堂上與同學和導師的激辯，無論在口才及對科目的認知，也是個好鍛鍊。
大學是令你了解自己能力的機會，也是容許你在未對現實社會前，浪漫和激情一番。大學是真正豐富了你的人生。
我不知道藍領生活能否同樣做得到呢？
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
