今次旅程的攝製，其實比想像中困難：天氣固然左右了不少拍攝程序，彼邦不少主題樂園式表演都規矩嚴謹，拍攝要申請不在話下，而且又要買高額第三者意外保險，令不少計畫要更改。而拍攝直升機高空鏡頭，也限定只能由攝影師及導演上機才可開門拍攝，主持也不能身處其中旁白。
但布里斯本天氣變幻莫測，以及昆士蘭中部的驟雨，也打亂了我們不少部署；原定在昆士蘭國會的外景，因天雨要改期，令我們要在橡樹日一早便要出發補拍；而由和域去圖文巴的豪雨，令我們計畫也有阻延。
不過這正是人生必定經過的，我們也有應變措施。這個世界最重要是靈活走位，有受訪人士遲到或早走，只要人面夠廣，一樣有人補上。
來澳洲時傾盆大雨，離開時也天雨連綿：這不是甚麼離愁別緒，也千萬不要叫我貴人。不如說我們好彩，整個製作順利完成，如期回港剪輯，七月一日出街。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
