由今晚起世界盃下線最後一圈開賽，形勢吊詭之處是除Ｈ組比利時及Ｆ組阿根廷之外，未有一隊是出梗綫，就算是阿根廷和比利時，今仗若有差池，小組首名也不保。
老實說，世界盃個個教練都兵不厭詐，睇對手走位連當年主辦國西德也一樣丟架地負於東德，其他隊伍尤其強隊自然也希望一直殺入四強，才向江東父老有所交代。
睇走綫阿根廷面對尼日利亞起碼要保住不敗，勝或和就是Ｆ組首名，下一圈對手極可能是瑞士或厄瓜多爾，遠比以次名出綫時極可能面對Ｅ組首名法國。但Ｅ組比賽較Ｆ組遲四小時，若Ｆ組有出人意表賽果(例如阿根廷負於尼日利亞)，我相信聰明的Ｅ組教練(尤其法國)就會盡量避免以首名出綫了。
至於Ｇ及Ｈ組，德美若和波就攜手出綫，德國得失球率較佳，和也是首名；估計遲開賽的Ｈ組比利時要和波或取勝以避開德國，面對的是南韓當然易如反掌；但如美國贏德國，比利時就算輸波，也要望阿爾及利亞贏俄羅斯兩球或以上才能變成次名。不過話雖如此，其實ＧＨ兩組賽果估計會正路。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
