英國古活馬場管理層簡直豈有此理，一百七十四年歷史的董事盃，居然要因為贊助商問題而要改名為32RED盃。大家都知這個是博彩網站的名字。
完全明白贊助商目前對全球賽馬的重要性。在不少地方如無贊助，根本連馬場也不能運作。但真正尊重賽馬傳統的，接受贊助之冠名而非除名。
景順投資贊助葉森打吡，永備電芯以前也贊助過；二者都分別是用景順打吡及永備打吡，最得體是鑽石商De Beers，當年贊助英皇喬治六世及伊利沙白皇后錦標，連自己名字也不用，只加了鑽石在尾就是我們熟悉的英皇鑽石錦標。就算是現在換上博彩平台贊助，也沿用英皇傳統，只是最後加上由博彩平台贊助的字樣。
香港也是做得好，保住賽事的傳統名字，再由贊助商冠名。而主席獎、董事盃、女皇銀禧盃及皇太后盃，都不接受贊助，是對領導人的尊敬。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
