自己在六月初分析的阿根廷只能獲亞軍，「悶」不贏今季亮麗打法的德國，相差只是七分鐘而已。
別些媒體已事後分析為何德國屢戰不疲，但其實他們面對加納及阿爾及利亞兩支非洲球隊，都有點老鼠拉龜，因為對手一樣與他們打體力，兼且只是初賽及十六強，拼輸來打反而逼到德國透不過氣來。
今屆德國面對花拳繡腿的技術型隊伍就打得漂亮了，四比零贏葡萄牙，七比一贏巴西，壓逼型打法令巴西兵敗如山倒。但打到決賽之第七場，德國就算是後備軍體力已不如前，又有基迪拉熱身傷出，九十分鐘已壓不住阿根廷。
阿根廷之敗一如九零年決賽，德國嘜死馬勒當拿，肯尼基亞又停賽，其他人無法打鬆德國防綫；今次阿根廷傷了迪馬利亞，美斯又被嵌制，沙比拿又莫明奇妙地半場換出最有威脅的拿華斯，改用不弗的阿古路。今次他們守到一一三分鐘才失守，己比九零年八十五分鐘仲輸十二碼為好。
不應將美斯比較馬勒當拿，因為美斯是天才，馬勒當拿是神！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
