讀過一篇關於香港養馬費與獎金的報道，資料明顯過時。以剛過去的賽季為例，馬兒只要是正常操練和出賽，一個月養馬費(包括策騎費及出賽報名費)平均必在四萬五千元以上，有時更是四萬八至九千，貼近五萬元。一年下來，五十萬是走不掉的。除非馬兒健康出問題，長期養在雙魚河休養才又作別論。
同時請記住，馬匹所贏的獎金不是全屬馬主。贏馬時，騎師練馬師及馬房會瓜分兩成半有多。以此計算，一匹馬一季若在四班贏兩場(不計位置及四四五五)，是不夠找贏馬費單加埋保險及過年紅包，還未計贏馬利是！
一匹馬在四班贏兩場，其實已是不俗收穫。香港馬口每年接近千二千三匹，賽事只是七百幾場，平均是一點幾到匹馬才能贏一場。每有一匹馬能贏兩場，換言之其實已有三匹馬當季無馬贏。
不過你問十個馬主，贏馬固然好，就算輸都未必介懷。因為不少馬主根本大把錢，只視馬場為招呼朋友和客戶的地方。養馬輸錢不緊要，帶來更大商機反而重要。子非魚，豈知魚之樂？
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
