不打算批評學聯及學民所說的是否不合邏輯的歪理，只要批評他們的態度。
一開口就劍拔弩張，說人大錯要道歉，說特首及政改三人組錯要辭職，彷彿今次不打仗不流血，他們就不罷休。
這些後生仔絕大部分在八九年都未出世，但如果有電視台肯回帶，將八九年五至六月間北京學運的片段原汁原味播給這批學生觀看，他們自然發現在態度上有很多與當年相似。
千萬不要誤會以為我說今次香港會流血收場，我相信港府不會野蠻到那個階段出真槍；但學生們完全不留情面和餘地的痛罵，根本不是為談判，也不是為得到結果，他們部分人凶狠的眼光，似有不共戴天之仇，而且開出的條件，是寸步不讓。到這個階段，大家都明白背後的目的，根本不是去解決問題了。
中央、政府和建制唯一的做法是繼續企，大家看見積極報道這個運動的報紙只得一張，電子傳媒也只有偏頗的兩個。戰事拖下去，誰勝誰負，大家明白。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
