與幾位不同政見的傳媒朋友把酒談如何解決目前的困局。很奇怪並無任何爭拗，而且結論也頗一致(細節當然有不同見地)，就是起碼示威會持續到周日晚，甚至下周一清晨。下周一清晨將是和平散去的好時機，倘若仍持續，危機就會升級，有排搞。
學聯及前主教很聰明地在九月廿七晚∕廿八凌晨就叫人和平散會，而佔中三子也醒目地在差不多時間就他們已無法控制場面，若然他們再積極主導佔鐘佔銅佔旺集會，必定被警察釘住而且有被拉被控煽動非法集會。而直至截稿時三地集會都和平理性，並無打劫、搶鋪頭、燒車等行為，否則隨時會被定性為暴動，再出防暴隊已是低限，更有藉口被中央介入平亂，就不堪設想，港人由周一起的克制，港人的情操，絕對值得一讚。
當中央一直堅定支持及擁護梁振英正確，大家就明白要中央換特首不易，要推翻人大決定更不易。如今最實際的做法是既然林鄭已延遲第二階級諮詢，就一於匯聚力量提出一個可行的提名及入閘方案。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
