臨離開澳洲前看過彼邦報章一篇報道，就是說費明頓嘉年華入場人數下跌，與入場收費過高不無關係。這點我絕對同意，但也明白外國大馬場通常要靠大賽賺錢去維持整年營運經費，收得貴也在所難免。
不妨與大家分享一下︰費明頓墨爾本盃公眾入場費是七十四澳元(折港幣五百元)，如果要對號位，則要二百廿五澳元(港幣一千五百元)，還不包飲食。想像香港馬場般有自助餐及飲品？有，承惠八百九十九澳元，超過六千港元。咁樣去跑一日馬，你們願意嗎？
美國又如何？育馬者盃賽日，三道菜式加不含酒精飲品，八百二十五美金一位，幾乎要六千五百港元。而杜拜世界盃賽日，有靚位兼食自助餐，彼邦貨幣三千，折港幣六千三百元！
香港就算是國際賽日，有靚位兼好飲食，也不過是五百港元左右。難怪外賓個個讚到香港天上有地下無。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
