上周才說起真路拿，剛才收到消息謂他將競逐國際足協會長之職，與白禮達一較高下。
不是說真路拿有甚麼機會，但大家看過柏天尼也能成功當選歐洲足協會長，一個法國名將去挑戰權貴，是革命國家一貫作風。
國際足球界絕不民主，而且絕對是個小圈子，自己友玩晒。白禮達之所以穩坐會長之位多年，與其高超公關技巧以及平衡各大洲勢力不無關係。
但國際足協手握世界盃主辦權，這是塊超級肥豬肉，角逐主辦權國家是由委員們選出，中間涉及的利益實在太大。二零一八的俄羅斯尚算合理，但二零二二年的卡塔爾有重大爭議聲的當選，而且至今仍未能克服場館問題和賽期問題，而當中牽涉的醜聞，大家都聽過，白禮達卻堅持不妥協。
當然今次有多人角逐會長，真路拿就算型象好，有博彩公司支持，但對手不弱，而白禮達也尋求連任，在他任內既得利益者眾多，究竟鹿死誰手，而誰人當選後國際足協會否脫胎換骨，仍是未知數。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
