悉尼冠軍系列的邀請早已在彼邦郵箱收到，與石爾純及希斯再研究過部署後，估計在兩個大賽日會興兵四路。
四月四日可能是前菜，「疾風」估計會在當日出戰三歲雌馬三級賽諾士錦標，希望憑磅利偷雞；自行培育的「敏捷女士」目標暫未清晰，也許出戰千六米三級賽卡賓會盃，又或角逐三歲雌馬千二米貝爾錦標。
主菜就精采了，四月十一日，固然「雷神女士」會挑戰澳洲橡樹大賽，但「星威人旺」相信也會由墨爾本北上，來蘭域角逐一級賽草上女皇錦標。而若「敏捷女士」放棄四月四日的千二及千六米，四月十一日有三歲千四米表列賽南太平洋錦標，一樣適合。
所以從杜拜回港不過幾日，我就立即南下赴會。睇電視直播？一向不是我的一杯茶，現在才能感受到震撼的氣氛。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
