有同事告訴我一個天大笑話，居然有罔顧事實的人在某些地方發底出的流言。
無論在上周四有線節目、賽日DBC電台錄音訪問、文字媒體的文章及社交網站的Post，我一直都是不分正副，雙龍出海。造謠的人不去睇上述節目或文章，卻在網上亂講話底出。可能部分留言版的網民容易信謠言吧！
馬匹冷熱不是我們控制的，你要買哪一匹，就會令另一匹馬變冷；你不買「快如疾風」，不可能怪罪任何一方，要怪只怪自己。輸錢而要夾硬亂講，不是君子所為。
有部分井底蛙可能不知，在杜拜高多芬有時可以一場出幾匹；在澳洲華禮納一場出四匹也不出奇，連上周六悉尼第三場鄉村錦標讓賽，李斯出馬六匹。如果上述例子不是馬房最熱的一匹贏馬，是底出嗎？更何況高多芬是不賭的，杜拜也是無博彩的。
倘若繼續有人用狹隘思想，下下用上世紀業餘時代眼光去大放闕詞，絕非馬圈之福。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
